Engineering the Invisible

Imagine inventing an entirely new kind of car engine that runs on, say, bacon. Well, you can’t just stick your new bacon engine into your car and expect it to run perfectly. You need to engineer it, then smooth out the kinks so that your bacon car runs as well as any other.  And, since you’re the inventive type, you probably want the bacon engine to allow you to do something magical – something more than just driving around like you could in a regular car.

Same story with the Lytro camera…minus the bacon.

It takes a village to bring Lytro to life, but three engineers on the Lytro image quality team are core to turning complex engineering into the simple beauty you see in living pictures.

Image Quality Team Brian Cabral, Bennett Wilburn and Chia-Kai Liang. Photo by Eric Cheng

In their element - Brian Cabral, Bennett Wilburn and Chia-Kai Liang (photo: Eric Cheng)

Engineers Brian Cabral, Bennett Wilburn, and Chia-Kai Liang represent some serious brainpower in the fields of light field science and computational photography. Brian’s background includes high-level positions at NVIDIA and Silicon Graphics, with quite a few patents and papers in computer graphics and computational photography. Chia-Kai received his PhD from National Taiwan University where his thesis was about light field capturing and processing. Bennett was on his way to a PhD in circuit design at Stanford, but switched his focus (pun intended) to computer graphics and vision. For this thesis, he designed the Stanford Multiple Camera Array, a system with 100 custom video cameras that could capture light field video.  Yikes, brainpower, indeed.

These guys had to figure out what to change and what to keep when building an entirely new camera around Lytro’s revolutionary new light field sensor.  Oh, and do it quickly, too.  While the digital camera industry had 20 years to evolve to where it is today, Brian and team had to work out the kinks in just a few years. And the ironic reality is this: the true measure of their success is that you won’t even notice their work.

How would you describe your work?

Brian: “Image quality starts with great hardware technology.  Our team helps define the optics, sensors, and computational processing required to make a stunning image”.

Chia-Kai: “I developed several algorithms inside our light field engine. I’ve also developed several algorithms to make the software fast and easy to use while delivering all the light field capabilities.”

OK, a little less technical please

Chia-Kai:The data captured by light field cameras is totally different from conventional photos. Therefore, we have to develop special software to process an incredible amount of data, yet make it easy for the user to understand how to use it. That software drives our light field engine, which is what lets you play with living pictures on your desktop, online, on your mobile phone – wherever they’re shared. And we have to keep all the functions people expect in their camera, like contrast and brightness enhancement.”

Bennett: “My role is to work on all aspects of image quality, from how we capture light fields to how we process them to create beautiful pictures.”

What have been some of the challenges of building a camera around a light field sensor?

Bennett: “We need to ensure that every camera we sell produces quality images. We are not only inventing the world’s first consumer light field camera, but also inventing all of the manufacturing processes for those cameras.”

We’ve also had to put aside what we know about traditional photography and build a new kind of camera around the new sensor. In a conventional camera, there was always this tension between aperture and depth of field, and the photographer had to spend time adjusting settings to get the shot she wanted. Now, with light field cameras, the photographer spends her time composing the shot. A key advantage of light field cameras is that they can shoot with the lens aperture wide open and not worry about the pictures being blurry. We collect as much light as possible, then refocus later (or just make everything in focus!).”

Brian: “On nearly a daily basis we encounter new challenges, because quite simply, we’re doing things no one has ever done.  Imaging light fields are full of surprises and complexities that make what we’re doing the most exciting thing I’ve ever worked on.”

Aside from the fun technical challenges, what makes you excited about the Lytro camera?

Bennett: “Our camera lets us compose entirely new kinds of images. We have been trained our entire lives to take flat pictures that work with traditional cameras. Everybody ‘knows’ that if you take a picture of something small really close to the camera, the background will be blurry. Everybody ‘knows’ that to take a group photo, the group stands in a line from left to right. Well, now people can play around with breaking those rules. That’s magic to me.”

“For example, some of the most interesting living pictures in our gallery have a story with two acts, one in the foreground and a second in the background. This happens in everyday life.  My friend sent me a wedding picture that had sharp bubbles in the foreground and a blurry married couple in the background. His [traditional] camera auto-focused on the wrong thing. The Lytro camera would have caught both pieces of that story.”

Chia-Kai: “This is a whole new way of taking and viewing pictures. I think people will understand how phenomenal the camera is once they see it in action. We talk about this being the next evolution of photography, and I think it really is.”

Brian: “I love the technical challenges of course. Rarely does one get work on something so compelling and technically rich.  A truly once in a lifetime opportunity to be at the inception of the next generation of imaging technologies.”

“I also love what we are doing for users. We’re trying to bring the magic of light field technology to every picture people take. That means allowing the images to tell an exciting story and be alive. Every painter starts with the same paints and color palette yet some paintings are compelling and others are dull and uninspiring. We let people effortlessly create great living pictures and tell richer stories with images. Living pictures let people relive the experience and share more of that experience.  If that’s not magic, I don’t know what is.”

  • Ken Zey

    Will it eventually be possible to create and export a 3d model, say as an .STL? Would it require a single ‘picture’ or a series of pictures stitched together with software similar do 123D Catch?

    • Lytro

      Much more is possible with light field technology. The first camera will not create 3D models.

  • Brett

    It seems to me that the Lytros camera captures light in a similar way to holography, as the Lytros image sensor doesn’t just capture light color and intensity values but also orientation. If this is true, if you had a means of projecting light out in an equal and opposite manner to how the light was received, could it then project a holographic image?

    If this is plausible, it seems to me you’ve created the camera of the future… now you just need to make the TV of the future to view it on.

    • Lytro

      Indeed, our light field camera captures both the direction and intensity of the light in a scene. We’re excited to explore its potential.

  • Ed Glass

    As the question will make obvious, I am seriously not a “techie”. However, trying to understand how this camera (if that is still the word) works . . . I have to wonder whether the image/data capture process might contain elements which otherwise configured could lead to the creation of a hologram or holographic image creation process?

    • Lytro

      Light field technology can be used to create holographic images. The first Lytro camera does not…this is just the beginning.

  • Michael

    How long does it take to record one image? I’m wondering if it is suitable for recording sports.

    When an image is converted to JPEG what are the dimensions?

  • Joseph Caswell

    Hello, I see many comments here that ask a very similar question, that I, scourring both the answered comments and the articles on this website could not find the answer to. And it is very important question if you ever want to mix these pictures with others we have taken with ‘normal’ cameras or print out the pictures.

    If we were able to export to say jpeg from your living/Lytro picture format (.lpf anyone?) what would be the estimated MP output?

    Also, I have seen that you guys say it works well in low light atmospheres and as a Macro camera, but I would like to see some pictures that demonstrate this. The most frustrating thing I have ever experienced as a photographer (excepting losing rolls of film or corrupted files) is not being able to focus/too much movement in low light atmospheres.

    Otherwise, great job with your new accomplishment!!! Thank you very much for your advancement in a field that is used by billions across the globe.

    • Lytro

      Thanks for your curiosity Joseph. We have designed the Lytro for online sharing and interaction with living pictures. It is not designed for large format printing. For those occasions when you want to print, you can “freeze” your living pictures by saving them as jpgs then print standard size snapshots.

      The living pictures you see in the Lytro Picture Gallery are representative of the image quality you can expect (but dependent on the screen resolution of your viewing device.) The pixel resolution of a light field camera system is not really relevant because pixels are very well defined. A pixel is color value and luminosity, and a light field camera’s unit of capture is much more than that because each unit contains directional light ray data in addition to color and luminosity. Light field cameras capture megarays, not megapixels. The first Lytro captures 11 megarays. Our target resolution is HD at 1080p, but the full answer isn’t completely straightforward. 2D projections in light field are rooted in computational photography, and 2D resolution can vary based on all sorts of factors including focal depth (refocus).

      The Lytro can handle many low light conditions, but we haven’t made any claims about its use as a Macro camera. We do have several indoor shots and outdoor shaded shots in our gallery that show the low-light capability, with this being the darkest. More to come…hope this helps.

  • Harry vand der Meeren

    As i am a photographer..
    The following question.
    Is it possible to make large prints from your Image.
    If I understood the system this is not possible at present,since you would have to increase the capture at least 50-100 times.
    Is this correct, and will it be possible in the future.

    Regards
    Harry

    • Lytro

      The Lytro is designed for online sharing and interaction with living pictures, not large format prints. This is just the beginning…

  • Dorian

    I can’t help but wonder how it performs in low light conditions? Like a concert or outside at night with just moonlight?

  • Jennis

    I love your technology!
    A few questions though:

    How close can we get to a subject for focus? If one can focus even millimeters close, its ideal for macro shots.

    I didn’t see any low-light photo subjects. Can you share photos taken in low light?

  • Ivan

    This is fantastic tech, have you any plans to develop algorithms to generate depth data from your images (depth from focus) ? This could have interesting applications for computer vision.

  • http://Pictureresolution Ignacio

    First of all, congratulations for this exciting and revolutionoary technology.
    I have been reading all the online documentation and still can not find what is the pixel resolution that the camera can provide. I am referring to the recently launched Lytro model. It only says “Produces HD-quality”, can you be more specific?

    thanks

    Ignacio

  • Art Walter

    You mention that photos can be exported as jpegs. Is the exported photo (jpeg) representative of the focus point you have chosen in the software? And, can you print a photo with the focus point you have chosen in the picture??

  • http://www.LoosePuppy.com Robert Seketa

    Would it it not make more sense to license the technology to Nikon/Canon/etc? These companies have been making some of the best cameras and lenses for years. It will take you years to come out with a camera as good as theirs, plus I’m sure they are looking into the same technology.

    Better to have them as a partner now than as competitor down the road…

    RGS

    • Samuel SantAna

      I agree with you.
      But these companies are too big. The change in paradigm that these guys made is overwhelming for their processes.
      What I think they should do is create a hardware that is compatible with these lens ;)

  • Mike

    Enough ppl already asked “can it take video” and answered, so I am not going to ask the same thing again. But how far are you guys from able to take video?

    Let me apply my layman common sense here: the len has to be able to take shoot fast enough so that it can take 20+ shoots per second in order to record a smooth video – something like that.

    How “fast” is the current Lytro now?

  • Mark Q

    I may have missed the answer but wondering if it will be possible to accurately measure distance between points in an image?

  • john

    The thing I greatly appreciate in a DSLR or for that matter any SLR is that when one en-gauges the shutter to take a picture it is taken there is no lag time/time delay for that to occur as with a Point & Shoot camera.
    Since your first camera will be a point and shoot, what will be the lag time/time delay between the time that the shutter is engaged and the actual picture is captured?

    • Adam “Goolie” Gould

      John,

      Light field cameras do not work like a point-and-shoot with autofocus. Since there is no need to focus, there is no shutter lag caused by the camera’s autofocus.

      –- Adam “Goolie” Gould
      Support & Community Manager
      help@lytro.com

  • Rosita

    How much will it cost?

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/clint_atkinson/ Clint Atkinson

    Light field will be/is revolutionary in image-making. Simple as that.
    I so want to get my hands on one of your cameras and see how far I can push it and find out how it affects my ways of seeing and recording!

    • Douglas Bender

      As a wildlife photographer, I am really interested in this new photographic capability. To be able to “see” all that is in the “frame of capture” will be a great stride in bring to others the reality of wildlife scenes. It should be closer to what the photographer is seeing with the naked eye and much more that we are not even aware of.

  • Russ

    Sounds like a very interesting camera.
    What will be required to view and manipulate images?
    Adjustable focus digital images on computers?
    Rendering to 2D photo output: e.g., jpg, RAW, TIF?
    Single frame 3D output? What visualization software and capabilities?
    Thoughts on photo editing on original capture formats? Photoshop like editing capabilities?

  • Edward T

    Hi Guys, The light field camera you have developed captures photons at the speed of light, (eliminates blurred images) and holds that data there for us mere mortals to come back and literally fly back through time by refocusng the image. You haven’t invented a new camera, but a real time machine :)
    But seriously, the images we hope to capture could really change peoples thoughts about faminie, disasters, pain and suffering. Can’t wait to get them out in the field and the images up on the web for all to comprehend the true scale and meaning of life.
    Thanks.
    Edward.

  • http://www.langellphotography.com Lisa Langell

    I’m unbelievably excited to begin using and testing the creative limits (or preferably–lack thereof) of this technology! I am a photographer and provide workshops/professional development. I cannot wait to learn all there is to know, and then get the rest of the world hands-on excited!

  • John

    Part of telling a story in a picture is to direct the viewer eye to a place in the picture and then leading it to other aspect/areas within the frame/picture. To do that, somethings still need to composed by the camera. For instance depth of field (controlling what what is in focus & what is not and by how much) contrast as well saturation in helping to shape the visual story within the frame

    There are concerns though.
    0 – Lens that will be available for the camera ex. nikon, cannon, carl zeiss, etc. for telefoto & wideangle views/photos?

    1 – can this camera and technology behind it take photos that hold up to large format 11″x14″ and larger?

    2 – I noticed when playing around with the photographs that when you focus in on one area the previous area went out of focus. Can the end user control the how much out of focus either the background or the foreground during post production for the final visual?

    3 – What is the post production going to entail. Is Lytro working with Adobe and/or any other like companies or are you going to be developing your own post production software?

    4 – how will these photos play in the photo frames that Kodak and others produce to present digital photos?

    • Steve S

      Good questions, same ones I have. I’m also wondering how lenses are going to work. I think the first camera is going to be a basic point-&-shoot but will it have a basic zoom lens or a single zoom level lens(like a Polaroid)? I’m and amateur outdoor photographer and love telephoto as well as macro-photo images. I hope you have more info on the specs of the first camera soon. I’m finding it hard to wait! I want to get started making history!

    • Lytro

      John – appreciate your curiosity. Some questions we can answer now – The *first* Lytro light field camera will be a standalone unit, so lens compatibility won’t apply. Light field technology is capable of allowing a huge range of control over the focus – as well as other aspects of the picture. What you see on our site is only the beginning…

      • Zachary Hadden

        I know this may sound off the wall and may be mind boggling to a viewer, but would it be possible to make the software dual or multiple focus capable? I.e. be able to focus on something in the foreground as well a different object in the background and still have the depth of field in between?

  • http://www.tigerxglobal.com Maria D’Marco

    this is the kind of advancement that makes getting up in the morning such a rush – cannot! wait to have one of these beauties in my hands!

  • Pavel Eskenazi

    First, I want to wish you to stay in the books for many years ;)
    Have you thought to use the light field camera for making 3D movies? I have always wanted some day to watch a 3D movie where you can focus at some object and the rest to go blurred … which I assume will be possible after you start mass production and decide to go further.

    • Lytro

      3D video is possible with light field technology, but our *first* camera will not shoot video. This is just the beginning…

  • mochapaulo

    I think your invention deserve a Noble Prize. However, there are several question I am fuzzed with the technology behind. First is the number of pictures for a single shot. Does the photo require several images with several focus with continuous drive? Second, if focusing is not depending on the lenses movement, does it mean the sensor move itself? Third, is the system designed to be lens interchangeable? Can it fit the lenses for the conventional product on the market.

    May be I am asking too deep. Or may be I am still cannot understand the concept of light field which can record all the data of light from different direction. Why I ask such a question is because if the lens is for tele photography (e.g. 200mm for 135 format), is your camera still workable to deal with the shallow depth of field? Hope you can answer your question. Thank you!

    Paulo

    • Lytro

      Paulo – The *first* Lytro camera will be a standalone unit. I’ll defer to our Science Inside page to provide deeper information on how a light field camera works.

  • Alan livsey

    Product photography- identify several items of importance in one shot horticulture shots- imagine two different bees in focus,

  • Linnea Heaverlo

    It’s obvious so many commenters are way smarter than I am…but as a more-than-casual, but less-than-pro user, I just want to get my hands on it and dink around with it ASAP!! Can’t wait, seriously. But, having said that, thanks, Lytro, for not buckling under pressure and bringing the camera out before it’s “done.” tick tock…..patiently, but excitedly, waiting…

  • Alex Frediani

    When I (finally!) want a particular image – and intend to both crop and enlarge it (as to save/print a copy) – what full-frame image density am I getting?
    To clarify, a Nikon DX3 has a full-frame (35mm: ~24 x 36) sensor
    that provides approx 24 Mpix. – what equivalent pixel density does a LYTRO image give me?

    • noop

      Study their papers. The final resolution so far is tiny.

    • Mike

      My guess is, seeing how this len is like using 10+ lens to capture light data in one shot, so my simple guess is that the resolution or the size will be only or less than 1/10 of the other normal camera assuming the size of lens are equal – so in your example it will be like 2.4M pix or less.

  • https://www.facebook.com/pages/MataNgBuhay/192001587524579?sk=wall Miguel Lisbona

    I love the article “engineering the invisible” and would look forward to the camera coming out and shipped in the Philippines… great for contemplative photography… Seeing life’s moments as it is with enlivened eyes…

  • Rick

    Do you foresee development of a light field video camera in the not-too-distant future? Interesting that this was one of the early areas of exploration – has that been a goal from the beginning?

    • http://www.lytro.com Adam “Goolie” Gould

      Video is possible. It won’t be available at first, but at some point…

      • Roger

        It will resolve a main issue of Video Surveillance that cannot shoot all the objects clear at the same time. As a result, blur image of suspect was provided in most of time. With this technology, surveillance camera can provide a clear image to kill the crime.

  • http://www.kbjdesign.net/portfolio Kathleen

    Are we still talking JPEGs here or is this a whole new file format? What would happen to the image if it were to be edited in PhotoShop?

    I’m loving this new technology already!

    • http://www.lytro.com Adam “Goolie” Gould

      It’s a whole new file format. You’ll be able to export your photos as .jpg, at which point you could do whatever you want with it in the image editing application of your choice. But of course, it’s no longer a lightfield image at that point.

      –goolz

      • http://www.kbjdesign.net/portfolio Kathleen

        Thanks for the reply. I just hope I get to be a hands-on tester as I do a lot of landscaping photography and this is my busy season. Wow…do I have some shots planned!

        • http://www.kbjdesign.net/portfolio Kathleen

          The Governor’s Mansion in Georgia, inside and out, is one of my first plans!

  • Marshall Sumner

    I am looking forward to seeing the camera that you produce. Will it be capable of using Canon or Nikon lenses, or do the lenses have to be designed to work with your chip? When do you anticipate putting the camera on the market?

    Is your software capable of recovering focus from an out of focus .jpg file from a canon camera? I have a once in a lifetime photo of my granddaugter’s graduation when the autofocus failed, which I would dearly like to recover.

    Good luck on your enterprise.

    • http://www.chriskphoto.com Chris

      Seeing as how a light field camera needs to first capture the light field to change the depth of field or focus of an image; I don’t see how it would be able to correct a non-light field image.

      • http://www.lytro.com Adam “Goolie” Gould

        Chris,

        That is correct. Our magic doesn’t extend to recovering information that was never collected to begin with >;-)

    • http://www.lytro.com Adam “Goolie” Gould

      Marshall,

      The initial Lytro camera is a stand-alone product that will not work with other lenses. See my response to Chris in answer to your other question.

      –goolz

    • noop

      To the limited extent this is possible but at cost of severe quality degradation. Lots of noise is introduced and detail level of recovered image is rather low. try focusmagic dot com
      Their hardware won’t work with existing lens as it requires more precise calibration of the whole optical system.

  • http://www.alicona.com Manfred

    How many distinct focal planes are represented in a light field image? When clicking at different locations on objects in your sample images that represent objects that vary continously in depth, it seems like the focus changes in discrete steps. Is that true?

    • Steven McQuinn

      No, If you read the PhD dissertation, you will see how the capture is continuous, not in discrete planes. The image presented to you is computed on the fly from the captured light field. It isn’t like image stacking, it’s better.

      SMcQ

      • Steven McQuinn

        I should add that the web samples may seem discrete because the focus zone tool looks like it covers an area, not a specific point. It would be hard to see a continuous refocus by discrete clicking.

        However, I’m hoping that for slide show videos it would be possible to set focal plane limits and render to video a continuous refocus between those limits. Would be a spectacular effect, just like the movies.

        SMcQ

      • noop

        As I understand the process, depth resolution is limited by microraster resolution and continuous changes are just result of interpolation. Maybe I wrong, but there are just 10-20 distinct sharp focus zones.

  • http://www.mikeconwell.com Mike Conwell

    You just lit another spark on ideas for the camera with a family photo spread out with more depth. There’s a family picture I’ve always wanted to take, but couldn’t imagine how I could get it all together. Now I’ve got a much better chance at making it happen.

    • Steven McQuinn

      Wow, I like this idea! Stack your family in a line receding from the camera, and have them fan out by leaning to the side, with each face in the clear. It really adds to the interactive fun by having family members click on the faces one by one. Already you are inventing uses even before having a camera in hand. (Me too.)

      SMcQ

  • Ryan Butters

    Thank you guys for your hard work!

  • http://somuatluri.com somu

    I know there has been a lot of work on this, im excited to see how things are implemented, Im guessing the shutter speed would be considerably slow in capturing the details and also the depth of field information… that would also be adding a lot of burden on the hardware for processing. final image size is also something that would matter. Hopefully all of these are already addressed to some extent. good luck guys.

    • Steven McQuinn

      I’m not an official commentator, but the claimed advantage of the Lytro camera is that the exposures are much quicker than autofocus cameras, and even can be used as video frames that are focused in post production, given the necessary software. The refocus computation is as quick as you see it on the web samples, using your own computer.

      The casual photographer can concentrate on framing and capturing the moment, rather on camera mechanics. That’s the whole idea.

      SMcQ

  • Jim A.

    Does the lightfield method of image processing have any advantages relating to dynamic range expansion? Is it possible to make HDR lightfield images allowing adjustment of local luminosity And focus depth?

  • Benji

    Just curious, any idea what kind of format you’re planning for the final camera? Point and shoot, interchangeable lens, waterproof? Also, what kind of glass? I assume you’re going to get the fastest you can for the form factor since the aperture shouldn’t be a limiting factor.
    So much excitement. Been waiting for this camera for a few years now!

    • Lytro

      The *first* Lytro will be a standalone unit.

      • Benji

        Will it take video? I won’t be disappointed if it doesn’t, as the complexity of video would be pretty huge, but it would be really awesome if it did.

        • http://www.lytro.com Adam “Goolie” Gould

          Benji,

          Light field video is possible, but will not be included in the initial Lytro camera.

          –goolz

          • anamorph

            Would it be possible with lightfield video to create anamorphic images? Filmmakers like JJ Abrams (Star Trek Super8) use anamorphic lenses because they create beautiful artifacts in unfocused areas. As areas go out of focus in anamorphic, they stretch vertically like the original lens.

  • http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.323455428344.194547.323330173344 Mark Kane

    Adjusting depth of field has been a primary tool of photographers for so long that a whole field of aesthetics has grown up around it. Likewise, control of focus. To be specific, some parts of an image look best to most of us when they are out of focus. The degree to which they are out of focus also matters. Will your camera and software enable setting the degree of focus throughout the image?

    • Steven McQuinn

      Again, not an official commentator, but the PhD dissertation mentions the ability to set with computation a deep focus (not infinite) that transcends what is possible with optics alone using a small aperture and long exposure.

      The light field capture allows a full aperture (depends on full aperture, actually), with computation setting the depth of field afterward. The samples on the web site don’t include a depth of field option, just a focal plane choice, near as I can tell. I’m hoping, along with you, that the first edition of the camera will allow maximizing the depth of field, which Lytro/Stanford have accomplished in their research.

      SMcQ

  • Jose

    Looks like the engineers had to overcome many problems with the hardware side of the light field technology. My only concern is sharpness, from looking at your gallery some of your photos don’t look very sharp. Either way I’m considering buying the camera hopefully by Thanksgiving/Christmas, would love to have some great photo shots during the holiday season.

  • Andrea

    Hello guys, I’m really fascinated by your light field camera!
    My question is:
    the camera will necessarly produce – sometimes! – a bad photo. How looks a bad photo made with a light field camera? Which are the problems associated with the light field camera photography? Which are the limits? Thanks.

    • Steven McQuinn

      Hah! a whole new industry for reviewers! Lytro advice, good idea!

      SMcQ

      • Samiul Amin

        The photo in the web shows the moving van is overlapped with the building behind. Is this one example of ‘bad photo’ with light field camera?